[Domyclass Help]

Assistance for COMM 110 AMU week 8 forum Essential Reflection and Evaluation Information & Digital Literacy American Military University is available at Domyclass

 

Congratulations! You have reached week 8, the final week of class. Reflect on your use of the Big 6 Research Model. What step was the most challenging? How did you overcome the challenge? Using the steps in the Big 6 Research Model, consider your process of locating sources, categorizing, organizing, critiquing, and presenting information for the project. What worked well for you? How will you sustain your new knowledge in order to support your education and career goals?

Now, in 4-6 sentences OR by creating or locating a hashtag, a 280 character “tweet” (Twitter account not required–POST HERE) or an image to share your reflections.

 

Forum Engagement

Please engage in meaningful conversation with your classmates and instructors. Post your initial response no later than 11:55 PM Thursday ET. Respond to your fellow classmates by 11:55 PM ET Sunday.

 

Week 8 Rubric	Exceeds (4)	Meets (3.4)	Needs Improvement (3)	Developing (2.6)	No Attempt (0)
ILO: Critical Thinking (Initial response demonstrated understanding)	Discussion response showed evidence of critical thinking by fully answering all parts of the prompt using both personal experience ANDinformation from the lesson to highlight points in initial response.	Discussion response showed evidence of critical thinking by fully answering all parts of the prompt using both personal experience OR information from the lesson to highlight points in initial response.	Initial response answered most of discussion promptAND did not provide evidence to support ideas.	Initial response answered half of discussion promptAND did not provide evidence to support ideas	Did not post.
ILO-IS.A.5: Quality of Academic Communication (Academic vs. Casual Language)	Forum communication reflected widely accepted academic writing norms, was easy to understand, and error free.	Forum communication reflected widely accepted academic writing norms, was easy to understand, and contained some minor writing errors.	The majority of forum communication reflected widely- accepted academic writing norms, was difficult to understand at times, and contained multiple writing errors.	The majority of forum communication did not follow widely- accepted academic writing norms, was difficult to understand, and contained numerous writing errors.	Did not post.
Communication Fluency (Quality of dialogue with peers)	Student responded to peers and demonstrated critical thinking by advancing the forum discussion. At least two of the following critical thinking components were used: •Offered advice or strategy; •Posed a question; •Provided an alternative point- of-view; •Acknowledged similar experience; •Shared a resource.	Student responded peers and demonstrated critical thinking by advancing the forum discussion. One of the following critical thinking components was used: •Offered advice or strategy; •Posed a question; •Provided an alternative point- of-view; •Acknowledged similar experience; •Shared a resource.	Student responded to peers, was on-topic, but did not contribute in a meaningful way.	Student responded to peers but response was off-topic.	Did not respond to peers.

[Author]

Posts