English labor | Marketing homework help

English Labor Emir7Task 1 Emic Etic Task 3

• a year ago
• 5

SUBJECT - SEMINAR 114-G

“Beyond reasonable doubt,” “innocent until proven guilty,” we have heard and talked about these phrases in class. The idea of a fair justice system is certainly what we hope for, but is it reality? For your essay, consider and evaluate one factor of the court system that may hinder it from reaching its ideal state. These could be factors that are obstacles to the truth (evolving forensics, mistaken witnesses), bias (racism, small town judgements, past records), or politics (between lawyers or pressure to close a case). These are just examples, feel free to think of your own, in fact it is encouraged! Highlight this factor with specific close reading examples from our textbook, and at least one of our four multi-media sources (“Monster”, “Serial”, “Death by Fire”, and “Kim Possible”). You may use ideas from your responses and freewrites. Terms: 3-5 pages, MLA intext citations, double spaced, 1 inch margins

MAKE PPT -

Translate your Essay into a brief (2-4 min) presentation to share with the class. We are working on your presentation skills with this. What you want this to look like is up to you. Some things to think about: how can you present your information in an easily accessible and engaging way? Ideas: (movie clips, clear and concise text, quotes, special effects)

PREP TASKS

(1) READ: This assignment is not a working final document assignment; however, it will eventually make its way to the working final document--just not yet. For this submission, you will need to create a new WORD document and you are expected to demonstrate the following compounded skills from previous weeks: · APA 7 Basics: double-spaced, before and after set to zero; 1 inch margins all around; Times New Roman, 12 pt font; page numbers, upper right in header · Page 1 = APA 7 Title Page: your title can be something along the lines of, "Objective Summary of Mitigation Research Articles" -- of course, it will be worded to be relevant to YOUR relevant research variable · Page 2-3 = Your two new objective summaries written as two separate academic paragraphs, one after the other (indented and full sentences) and color-coded with the designated colored font for each component. Use your EXCEL Research Tracker to help you summarize one of your research articles in your own words: hint: copy this color chart into your Word document where you will write these, so you remember! WHO = Dark BLUE

WHY = PURPLE

WHEN = RED

WHERE = GREEN

HOW + Process = ORANGE WHAT = Lighter BLUE · Page 4 = Your APA 7 References Page (with only the research article you summarized) (2) REVIEW: Open the following student sample document. Be sure yours looks similar prior to proceeding.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT TASKS

(1) PLAGIARISM CHECKERS: Review the following document to learn how to meet the newly implemented submission requirements that will be expected for each written assignment in the remaining weeks:

(2) CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY:

· Submit your assignment into the CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY HERE folder · Evaluate EVERY highlighted text EXCEPT the References Page and in-text citations to ensure it links only back to your own work.

(3) TAKE YOUR AI TEXT DETECTOR SCREENSHOT:

· Paste your written text into this FREE AI Text Detector: Click here --> Scribbr AI Text Detector · Take a screenshot of your text and the percentage (NOT TO EXCEED 30%), one for each objective summary written. (4) FINALIZE: Make sure your screenshot looks like the screenshot below. (5) SUBMIT: Attach your AI screenshot(s) WITH your WORD document submission. You will be attaching 2 documents in the submission box: (1) the screenshot(s) first, then (2) your assignment. Racial Disparities in Healthcare Among Pregnant Women in the United States Tamifer Lewis Department of Public Health, Monroe College, King Graduate School KG604-144: Graduate Research and Critical Analysis Dr. Manya Bouteneff December 4, 2022 Color coding: who, when, where, why, how methodology & how process, what A study was conducted by Nichols and Cohen (2020), between 2006 and 2018 to examine the methods used to improve the results of maternal mortality in California. The study was conducted using a scoping review to evaluate research on women and maternal health in the United States. The researchers used information from the US Maternal Fetal Medicine Network to measure the percentage of studies where pregnant women, women, and children were the main focus. The researchers also reviewed documentation on healthcare policies and practices from California’s public health department, healthcare foundation, and Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Nichols and Cohen (2020) found that although the health of fetus and children could be adversely affected by the health of the mother, the majority of maternal programs in the United States places emphasis on the child. The researchers also found four areas of concern in women health experiences, both in pre and postnatal care. The problem areas entailed inadequate investment in women's health, inefficient quality of care and avoidable caesarean delivers, expanding disparities in minority women and women living in rural areas, and contradictory collection and distribution of data (Nichols & Cohen, 2020). Zhang et al. (2013) conducted a study between 2005 and 2007 to calculate the excessive rate of unfavorable outcomes in pregnancy within racial and ethnic groups. The study also aimed to measure the possibility of Medicaid savings that are linked to paid maternal care claims resulting from the inequalities that contribute to unfavorable maternal outcomes. A cross- sectional study using Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data was used to gather pregnancy outcome information from inpatient hospitals from 14 states (Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, North Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maryland, Missouri, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia, and Texas). The study consisted of a little over 2 million patients who were insured with Medicaid and had a delivery code of maternal delivery stay. Zhang et al. (2013) found that, with the exception of gestational diabetes, African American women showed the worst outcomes out of all unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. These disparities are postulated as being multi-factorial, having causes stemming from complicated experiences with racism, poverty, and complex healthcare interactions. It was also found that women covered under Medicaid health insurance were more likely to have consistency in care from prenatal care through delivery compared to their counterparts. However, due to participation in Medicaid programs being influenced by reimbursement rates, some providers may choose to stop accepting Medicaid patients because of reimbursement delays and low payment rates, which could contribute to negative birth outcomes (Zhang et al. 2013).

References

Nichols, C. R., & Cohen, A. K. (2020). Preventing maternal mortality in the United States: Lessons from California and policy recommendations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(1), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00264-9 Zhang, S., Cardarelli, K., Shim, R., Ye, J., Booker, K. L., & Rust, G. (2013). Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(8), 1518+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A344827866/PPNU?u=nysl_me_moncol&sid=bookmark- PPNU&xid=51747d52