L&cp week 3 discusssion | Psychology homework help

L&CP Week 3 Discusssion Ms90Instructions Chapters 5 and 6 explored the 4th Amendment subjects of arrests and searches both with and without warrants. With these course readings in mind consider and respond to the following questions:

• In Atwater, the Supreme Court held that the 4th Amendment does not prohibit law enforcement from conducting full custodial arrests for minor criminal offenses which, at a maximum, can only be punished by a fine. Do you agree with this opinion? Why or why not?
• What was the rationale given by the Supreme Court in Chimel for permitting searches without a warrant when they are made incident to arrest? Also, given the rationale of the Court in Chimel for this warrant exception, how do you think arrests of occupants of cars should be treated?
• One of the numerous exceptions to the warrant requirement is "consent." Read U.S. v Matlock at: UNITED STATES v. MATLOCK, 415 U.S. 164 (1974). How do you personally feel about the lawfulness of third party consent searches? Do you think it is appropriate, under the rule of joint authority, for another person to be permitted to give consent for you?
• Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision in Illinois v. Rodriguez? Do you think it was correctly decided? Why or why not?
• 2 months ago
• 1

other Questions(10)

• Discussion Question
• BA 265 Week 4 Assignment, Strict Liability.
• i need 200
• Safety Risk Mnagement
• BUS 409 Week 11 Quiz 10
• BUS 409 Week 4 Quiz 3
• Tutor Carole
• Succession Planning Procedure In a minimum of 500 words, document a succession plan for an employee (e.g., IT Developer, Maintenance Crew, Training Specialist, CEO) of your chosen firm. What concepts are crucial when recruiting team members? Be sure to
• RESERVED FOR MAGZ64 1 page
• Discussion due thursday