Research proposal | Psychology homework help

Research proposal mbro9981I need guidance on a research proposal

• a year ago
• 60

THE SIGNATURE PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION

The culminating requirement in ED504 is the final iteration of your Signature Project Stage 1. The Signature Project Stage 1 is your research proposal. It is designed to guide candidates through the steps for planning an experimental study to examine an in-depth school improvement project focused on improving teaching and learning. The project involves an opportunity for candidates to apply the knowledge, skills, and behaviors they gain from their respective programs. Cover Page Abstract Chapter 1: Research Problem

Introduction

Statement of the Research Problem (include hypothesis) Data Graphic and Discussion Impact on Student Achievement Research Methodology Summary (of chapter 1) Chapter 2: Literature Review

Introduction

Sub-headings (according to the organization of your study) Synthesis of Literature Review Chapter 3: Methodology

Introduction

Population Sample Sample Technique (with justification) Role of Participants and Impact on Participants (with explanation) Plan for Protection of Human Subjects Variables Timeline (with sequence of steps and timeline for data collection) Constitutive and Operation Definitions Description of Data (data needed) Reliability and Validity of Instrument Limitations References Appendix A: Consent Form Appendix B: Permission to Study Appendix C: Copy of the instrument or survey if one is used. General Guidelines · APA format. · Double-space using Times New Roman 12 pt. font size. Follow the example found in the Course Resource section of this course. · Top, bottom and side margins must be 1 inch. · Pages must be numbered, top flushed right. · Organize the literature review according to themes important to the study. · Direct quoting of other authors is not permitted. All written text should be in your own words. · Appropriately cite all information sources using APA. · Include a minimum of ten scholarly sources, five of these sources should come from the primary literature (ED504 requirement). All ten sources should primarily be from the past five years. · References should be in APA format and on a separate page in the document. · If your scholarly literature sources were obtained from an Internet site (e.g., online journal article), include the URL and the date downloaded as part of the bibliographic details presented. Check APA on formatting. · Grammar and spelling must be correct. Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric Writing Components CATEGORY Unacceptable (0 points) Revisions Required (2.5 points) Target (5 points) Are the focus and purpose clear and ideas well supported? Missing thesis; confusion about or misunderstanding of topic; no sense of purpose Simplistic and unfocused ideas; limited sense of purpose; support is provided, but is not specific; support is only loosely relevant to the main points Developed thesis; represents sound understanding of the assigned topic; focused support is provided and is sound, valid, and logical Is the writing structured well organized? Is correct sentence structure and proper mechanics utilized? No paragraph structure; or single, rambling paragraph; or series of isolated paragraphs; Contains multiple and serious errors of sentence structure: i.e., fragments, run-ons; unable to write simple sentences; numerous errors in spelling and capitalization; intrusive and/or inaccurate punctuation; communication is hindered Organization structure is present, but is confusing or disjointed; weak paragraph structure; transitions are missing or inappropriate; Formulaic sentence patterns or overuse of simple sentences; errors in sentence structure; contains several punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors (up to 6); errors may or may not interfere with meaning Clear organizational structure; easily followed; includes transitions; structured format; Effective and varied sentences; errors (if present) due to lack of careful proofreading; virtually free of punctuation, spelling, capitalization errors (no more than 3); errors do not interfere with meaning Are vocabulary and word usage varied and appropriate? Vocabulary is unsophisticated; or subject specific vocabulary or sophisticated vocabulary used incorrectly Proper, but simple vocabulary used; subject specific vocabulary used infrequently Vocabulary is varied, specific and appropriate; uses subject specific vocabulary correctly Is the source requirement met and is APA format followed? Source requirements for the appropriate level were not met; there are significant format errors present; multiple (more than 6) of APA formatting errors; in the reference list and/or in-text citations Meets minimum requirements for degree level: Masters – A minimum of 10 sources were utilized; Fewer than 6 APA format errors are present in the reference list in-text; citations; header; headings; page numbers; etc. Five (5) sources beyond minimum requires were utilized; there are virtually no APA format errors present in either reference list in-text; citations; header; headings; page numbers; etc. Is proper evidence and support of original work provided in body of the review? Safe Assign originality report indicates match percentage of greater than 25 percent Safe Assign originality report indicates match percentage of 15 to 25 percent Safe Assign originality report indicates a match percentage of less than 15 percent Content Components CATEGORY Unacceptable (0 points) Revisions Required (2.5 points) Target (5 points) Source of data is credible, and data is representative of the scope requirements for the advanced degree being sought (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1) The source of the data is ambiguous or lacks credibility; data does not allow for problem/weakness identification appropriate for required project scope The source of the data is clear and credible; data does not allow for problem/weakness identification appropriate for required project scope The source of the data is clear and credible; data allows for identification of an of a classroom, multi- classroom, school or district level problem/weakness appropriate to the required project scope Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric Graphical representation of compiled data allows for easy analysis

(CAEP A1.1)

Graphical format does not present the data in a clear manner; data is only partially presented Graphical format(s) is appropriate and clearly presents all the collected data Graphical format(s) is appropriate; clearly presents all the collected data; highlights visible patterns or trends Identified problem/weakness is supported by trends or patterns seen in the data (InTASC 6, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) Problem/weakness is not clearly identified or does not align with the trends and patterns identified in the data Problem/weakness is clearly identified; aligns with the type of data collected, but connections between the trends/patterns in the data are not clearly described in the narrative Problem/weakness is clearly identified; aligns with the type of data collected; clear connections between the trends/patterns are drawn in the narrative Best practices are identified and supported by the literature as viable responses to weaknesses and problems represented by the data (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEPA1.1) Best practice(s) are not clearly identified; literature reviewed does not support the identified best practice(s) as a viable option to improve achievement Best practice(s) are clearly identified; literature reviewed does not support the identified best practice(s) as a viable option to improve achievement Best practice(s) are clearly identified; literature reviewed supports the identified best practices as viable responses to the problem/weakness identified Theories and/or trends are identified and connected with best practices in literature (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) Theory or trend is not identified; theory/trend identified are not connected with the best practice(s) via literature Theory or trend is clearly identified; literature reviewed does not connect the identified theory/trend with the identified best practice Theory or trend is clearly identified; literature reviewed connects the identified theory/trend with all identified best practices Proper level of synthesis is achieved in the literature review (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) Summaries were given; are not clear or fail to make clear connections with best practice(s) and/or theory/trend(s) identified as viable responses to problem/weakness Summaries are clear and concise; clear connections with best practice and/or theory/trend identified as viable response to problem/weakness may or may not be present Synthesis rather than summaries of content presented in the collection of sources is present, clear connections with best practice and/or theory/trend identified as viable response to problem/weakness present Description of plan is clear and easy to follow (InTASC 7, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) Action plan is not described; description is not clear; steps in plan are not in a logical order Action plan description is provided, but additional detail may be warranted; steps in plan are outlined, but additional steps may be needed, or the order could be altered for better efficiency Action plan description is provided, and sufficient detail is included; steps in plan are outlined; exhaustive list of steps and sequence of steps allows for optimal efficiency and outcome. Project timeline accounts for all elements in the plan and allocates appropriate amounts of time for each element (InTASC 7, 10; CAEP A1.1) Project timeline is missing or incomplete; time allocation is inadequate or too extensive for one or more elements included in the plan Project timeline is provided; all elements identified in the plan are included, but additional elements might be needed for an improved outcome; timing and/or time allocation could be improved Project timeline is provided; all necessary elements are included for optimal outcome Variables are identified and defined

(CAEP A1.1)

Variables are misidentified Variables are identified correctly, but with no clear definitions or explanations as to how they will be measured Variables are identified correctly, with clear definitions and explanations as to how they will be measured Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric Required data needs are identified and plans for retrieving and protecting that data are clear (i.e., methods) (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1) Data needs are not identified or do not align with the problem; data retrieval plans are missing or inappropriate Data needs are identified; data retrieval plans are included, but plans for protecting the data and/or student confidentiality are not provided or are inadequate Data needs are identified; data retrieval plans are included; adequate plans for protecting student confidentiality and/or data are provided Description of the sample and sampling techniques are provided

(CAEP A1.1)

Detailed descriptions of the participants are not given and/or sampling technique is not provided Brief overview of the sample is given, and sampling technique may or may not be included Full descriptions of the participant sample, sampling technique and justifications for both the sample chosen and the sampling technique are given Needed resources are identified, justified, and a leverage plan for acquiring resources is clear and supported (InTASC 5, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) Resources are not identified or are inadequate; no justification for the resources is provided; unclear how identified resources might be acquired; plan for acquiring resources is inadequate or ill conceived Resources are identified, but additional resources may be needed; justification for the resources is provided, but leverage plan for acquiring resources is not clear Exhaustive list of resources is identified; justification for the resources is provided; leverage plan for acquiring resources is outlined Justification for how the action plan will address the identified problem is clear (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) No connection between the action plan and the identified problem is provided Connection between the action plan and the identified problem is provided Connection between the action plan and the identified problem is provided; justification of that connection is included Connection between action plan and impact on student achievement is clear (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1) No connection between action plan outcome and student achievement is provided Connection between action plan outcome and student achievement is provided; justification of that connection may or may not be included Connection between action plan outcome and student achievement is provided; justification of that connection is included; limitations or outside interferences to improved student achievement are identified Do appendices include necessary documentation? Most items required in the appendices are not presented in the appendices; the plan and necessary steps to protect human subjects in research are not clear Most required items are presented in the appendices; items and plan for ethical practices in protection of human subjects are weak All required items are presented in the appendices; items clearly demonstrate ethical practices in protection of human subjects

• Literary Analysis essay
• ( Aviation Safety topic)
• enzyme paper
• International Marketing
• computer security#6639
• BUSINESS ENTITIES
• A+ Work
• Write an 800-1,000-word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term "spirituality," and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven b
• ebook purchase for faculty edition
• Please help